Indicators (15/119)

This redflag indicates risk if there are any complaints from the bidders about the evaluation process

The indicator tells if the procuring entity - within the scope of technical and professional capacity requirements of the procurement call - extends the past period of the required references unduly, by derogation from the period as defined by law (5-8 years in case of works, 3-6 years in case of acquisition of goods and services).

This redflag indicates risk if the evaluation criteria differ from those issued in the bidding documents AND/OR improper or arbitrary evaluation sub-criteria or procedures are developed at the time of evaluation that differ from the issued bidding documents AND/OR there are changes in the scoring of bids or arbitrary scoring of bids

The indicator tells from the wording of the procurement call if the procuring entity, with regard to technical and professional capacity requires references "financed by EU-funds" (which might be an unduly restriction of competition).

The indicator tells if the publication of notice holds no prescription of minimum criteria with regard to economic and financial eligibility. This indicator is built upon legal provisions.

The indicator tells if the procuring entity does not indicate the evaluation method of bids among the the evaluation criteria. This indicator is built in accordance with the Hungarian legal provisions and scans procurement calls.

This redflag indicates risk if the winning bidder is not on the short list or is not one of the prequalified companies

The indicator tells if the procuring entity did not indicate in the procurement call the method of ranking if setting the range of the number of competitors.

The indicator scans the wording of the procurement calls and if the the principle of the economically most advantegous bid is applied for evaluation criterion, flags procedures where payment deadline (and its duration) - as an evaluation subcriterion - is also applied. This indicator is built upon expert knowledge about corruption risks.

This redflag indicates risk if there is unusual or unreasonable evaluation criteria for short-listing AND/OR One or more of the short-listed consultants or prequalified companies does not have the appropriate qualifications for the assignment AND/OR there is a wide gap in qualifications of the short-listed companies AND/OR Highly qualified firms have expressed interest and are not short-listed